Education 2047 #Blog 42 (03 JUL 2025)
A question has been simmering beneath the surface of my professional life, growing more urgent each time I read a new research paper or witness another technological leap forward: Will universities survive the age of AI and BCI?
It’s not a rhetorical question, nor is it intended to be alarmist. It’s a genuine inquiry, rooted in my work in technology foresight and a growing body of evidence that suggests the very foundations of higher education are being shaken by forces more powerful and pervasive than anything we’ve seen before.
For years, I’ve been writing and speaking about how universities, as institutions, are drifting perilously close to irrelevance because they have largely ignored the profound technological upheaval transforming society. Peter Diamandis, the futurist and founder of XPRIZE, has been raising similar alarms, warning that traditional universities could face mass extinction unless they undergo radical transformation.
The culprit isn’t a single technology but a convergence of multiple forces: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI), mixed reality, and the democratizing power of the internet. Together, these forces are not merely enhancing education—they are redefining its very purpose.
The Technological Earthquake Beneath Higher Education
Let’s first ground ourselves in some data, because this isn’t speculation—it’s happening now. The global market for online learning is projected to reach $319 billion by 2025, more than three times its 2020 size. The market for AI in education is expected to surge to $6 billion in the same time frame, driven by intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning platforms, and automated content creation. Meanwhile, mixed reality (XR) is growing at an annual rate exceeding 44 percent, promising immersive learning environments that blend the digital and physical worlds.
Yet these figures, significant as they are, only scratch the surface of what’s coming. The most transformative forces are AI and BCI—technologies poised not merely to support learning, but to radically redefine how human beings acquire, process, and apply knowledge.
AI: The Rise of Machine Intelligence as Teacher
For centuries, education was fundamentally a process of storing knowledge in human brains. We learned facts, memorized formulas, and repeated them in examinations, because the only reliable “hard drive” we had was the one inside our skulls. But that premise has collapsed.
Large Language Models like GPT-4 and its successors can now explain complex concepts, summarize dense academic texts, generate essays, simulate tutoring dialogues, and even help students debug code or solve advanced mathematics problems. Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have evolved into personal learning companions capable of tailoring explanations to individual learners’ styles, speeds, and prior knowledge.
This is far beyond a digital library or a smart search engine. These systems are outsourcing cognitive work that used to belong exclusively to human experts. Peter Diamandis has described AI tutors as ultimately “far better than any human teacher at personalizing learning to the individual.” I share that assessment—and I believe that’s why the traditional university lecture is becoming obsolete at astonishing speed.
We’re no longer talking about digitizing lectures or placing syllabi online. We’re talking about a world where machines can teach, test, provide instant feedback, and even generate new knowledge. In this world, the question shifts from “What do you know?” to “What can you do that machines cannot?
BCI: Learning at the Speed of Thought
Even more profound than AI’s impact is the impending revolution of Brain-Computer Interfaces. For decades, BCIs were confined to science fiction or medical research labs. But that’s changing rapidly. Companies like Neuralink, Kernel, and others are developing devices capable of decoding brain signals with extraordinary precision, creating a direct link between the brain and external digital systems.
Imagine learning a foreign language through direct neural stimulation, bypassing months of classes. Picture real-time translation streamed straight into your auditory cortex while you listen to a lecture in a language you’ve never studied. Envision compressing years of technical training into weeks because new neural pathways are forged by precisely targeted electrical signals.
These possibilities are not purely speculative. In 2021, researchers achieved brain-to-text communication at a rate of 90 words per minute in paralyzed patients. BCIs have enabled monkeys to control robotic limbs through thought alone. Analysts now forecast commercial human BCI applications within this decade.
If AI represents a “brain outside the brain,” BCI is about rewiring the brain itself. It promises to collapse learning timelines and render traditional educational structures quaint, if not entirely obsolete. Peter Diamandis predicts that BCIs will “supercharge human cognition.” I believe they will obliterate the slow, linear model of traditional education. Once we can download knowledge or accelerate synaptic learning, the idea of spending three to five years earning a degree will seem almost absurd.
The University’s Dilemma: Denial and Inertia
Despite these profound changes unfolding around them, many universities remain locked into centuries-old models. They digitize lectures rather than reinvent pedagogy. They continue to demand memorization for examinations, even though AI can supply facts instantaneously. They cling to rigid degree structures at a time when digital credentials and blockchain-based badges are challenging the university’s traditional role as gatekeeper of professional validation.
This resistance to change is not entirely surprising. Universities are among the oldest continuously operating institutions on earth, some stretching back a thousand years. Their prestige, authority, and business models are deeply intertwined with tradition, physical infrastructure, and regulatory systems that move at glacial speed.
There’s also a very human dimension to this inertia. Educators fear that machines might replace their roles—or at least render them less central. Administrators worry about the collapse of tuition revenue models, alumni networks, and reputational rankings. And students themselves are often conditioned to believe that the traditional degree remains their best hope for future success.
Yet as Diamandis emphasizes, technology advances exponentially. Universities that fail to acknowledge this reality risk not merely falling behind—they risk becoming irrelevant.
Beyond Memorization: The New Purpose of Universities
If memorization is obsolete, and if AI and BCI are taking over information delivery and even aspects of cognition itself, then universities must redefine their purpose. What remains uniquely human?
First and foremost, universities can become centers of creativity and critical thinking. While AI can generate content and solve certain problems, it still struggles with complex ethical reasoning, deep contextual understanding, and truly novel creativity. Humans remain irreplaceable when it comes to synthesizing disparate ideas, empathizing with others, and innovating solutions for ambiguous challenges.
Universities must also embrace experiential learning. Knowledge isn’t just something to be memorized; it’s something to be practiced, built upon, and integrated into real-world contexts. Mixed reality, AI-driven simulations, and hands-on projects can transform education into an immersive experience where students learn by doing.
Equally important, universities should serve as hubs for community and human connection. They are places where diverse individuals meet, collaborate, debate, and form relationships that often last a lifetime. AI may simulate conversation, but it cannot replicate genuine human bonds, mentorship, or the complex social dynamics that foster personal growth and emotional intelligence.
Finally, universities should evolve into engines of lifelong learning. In a world where the half-life of knowledge is shrinking, people will need to retrain and upskill continually. Universities can play a crucial role by offering flexible pathways, personalized curricula, and micro-credentials that adapt to each learner’s evolving career and life goals.
Will Universities Survive?
Peter Diamandis and I are both on same page: we’re not witnessing a minor tweak in how education operates. We are watching a profound reinvention of what it means to learn, teach, and certify human capability. Technologies like AI and BCI will make rote learning unnecessary, compress knowledge acquisition into breathtaking timescales, and erode the traditional monopoly universities have held over credentials.
The question is no longer whether this transformation is coming. It’s already here, gathering momentum with each passing year. The only questions left are: How fast will it happen—and who will adapt in time?
I believe universities can survive—and even thrive—in the age of AI and BCI. But survival will depend on their willingness to shed old identities and embrace entirely new roles. They must become architects of human potential in an age where machines handle information faster and better than we ever could.
So I return to the question that keeps me awake at night: Will universities survive the age of AI and BCI? They can—but only if they stop looking the other way and start leading the future.
I’d love to hear your thoughts, in the comment box at the end. Are universities ready to evolve—or destined to become relics of a pre-digital age?
About the Author
With a career spanning the crossroads of education reform and technological foresight, the author is currently the Pro-Chancellor of JIS University in Kolkata. His professional journey includes influential national positions, having served as Adviser to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and as a Scientist at the Technology Information, Forecasting and Assessment Council (TIFAC).
Drawing on decades of experience analyzing technological trends and their impact on learning, he played a pivotal role in crafting the landmark report Technology Vision 2035: Roadmap for Education, which mapped how emerging technologies could transform India’s educational landscape.
The perspectives shared in this article are solely those of the author and do not represent official views of any organization with which he is affiliated.
§ Breaking the Silos: Reimagining Universities without Subjects (PART I)
§ Designed to Label, Doomed to Lose: Rethinking a System that Fails its Learners§ The Missing Catalyst: Peer Learning as the Core of Educational Transformation
§ The Great Educational Reversal: Responding to AI's New Role in Learning
§ Architects of Viksit Bharat: Why Universities must Recognize Achievement over Graduation
§ Liquidating Cognitive Stagnation in UG Education- The 'SPRINT' Model Blueprint for Change
§ Architects of Viksit Bharat: Why Universities must Recognize Achievement over Graduation
§ The Digital Macaulay: A Modern Threat to Indian Higher Education
§ Why Instant Information Demands a Fundamental Rethink of Education Systems?
§ From Pedagogy to AI-Driven Heutagogy: Redefining Leadership in Universities
§ NEP 2020: Can India’s Education Policy Keep Pace with the FLEXPER Revolution?
§ The Liberating Manifesto: Empowering Faculty to Break Traditional Boundaries
§ From Memory to Creativity: Rejigging Grading & Assessment for 21st Century Higher Education
§ Accreditation and Ranking in Indian Academia: Adapting to New Learning Paradigms
§ Reimagining Education: FLEXPER Learning as a Path beyond Age-based Classrooms
§ Broken by Design: The Worrying State of Secondary Education in India
§ Rethinking Learning: A World Without Curriculum, Classes, Nor Exams
§ Empowering Learners: Heutagogical Strategies for Indian Higher Education
§ Heutagogy: The Future of Learning, Rendering Traditional Education Obsolete
§ The Forgotten Half: Learning from Fallen Ideas through the Metaphor of Dakshinayana
§ 3+1 Mistakes in the Indian Higher Education System
§ Weathering the Technological Storm: The Impact of Internet and AI on Education
§ The High Cost of Success: Examining the Dark Side of India's Coaching Culture
§ Navigating the Flaws: A Journey into the Depths of India's Educational Framework
§ FromKnowledge to Experience: Transforming Credentialing to Future-Proof Careers
§ Futuristic Frameworks- Rethinking Teacher Training For Learner-Centric Education
§ Unveiling New Markers of India's Education-2047
§ Redefining Doctoral Education with Independent Research Paths
§ Elevating Teachers for India's Amrit Kaal
§ Re-engineering Educational Systems for Maximizing Learning
§ 'Rubricating' Education for Better Learning Outcomes
§ Indiscipline in Disciplines for Multidisciplinary Education!
§ Re'class'ification of Learning for the New Normal
§ Reconfiguring Education as 'APP' Learning
§ Rejigging Universities with a COVID moment
§ Reimagining Engineering Education for 'Techcelerating' Times
§ Uprighting STEM Education with 7x24 Lab
§ Dismantling Macaulay's Schools with 'Online' Support
§ Moving Towards Education Without Examinations
§ Disruptive Technologies in Education and Challenges in its Governance
Amazing blog- a must read for all of us
ReplyDeleteLord bless you dear Sir, keep it up 👏💐
Thank you so much for your kind words and blessings! 🙏 It truly means a lot. I’m glad you found the blog worthwhile. Encouragement like yours keeps me motivated to keep writing and sharing. Blessings to you too!
DeleteThanks Dr Saxena Saheb for sharing your logical views on contemporary issues of AI.
ReplyDeleteI will also go through your other write up ..
Vinod Agarwal
Shikshayatan group of educational institutions
Many thanks, Vinod ji, for your thoughtful note. I’m glad you found my views on AI in Education relevant. Do explore the other pieces as well—I’d be keen to hear your perspectives. Warm regards!
Delete